{"id":892,"date":"2010-10-17T12:22:21","date_gmt":"2010-10-17T18:22:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/coloradoconfluence.com\/?p=892"},"modified":"2013-09-06T18:08:46","modified_gmt":"2013-09-07T00:08:46","slug":"a-choice-between-our-hopes-and-our-fears","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/coloradoconfluence.com\/?p=892","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;A Choice Between Our Hopes and Our Fears&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/A-Conspiracy-of-Wizards-ebook\/dp\/B00F07YZOK\/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&#038;qid=1378468154&#038;sr=8-2&#038;keywords=a+conspiracy+of+wizards\"><strong>Buy my e-book <em>A Conspiracy of Wizards<\/em><\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The title quote, uttered by President Obama to describe the choice we have in\u00a0the 2010 elections, captures the essence of\u00a0the on-going struggle between humanity&#8217;s inner-angels and\u00a0inner-demons, a struggle which produces the realization of both our dreams and our nightmares, depending on which prevails in any given moment of history.<\/p>\n<p>The refrain &#8220;we want our country back&#8221; is the refrain of those who fear progress, who cling to a mythologically sanitized\u00a0past rather than forge a path into the inevitable future. It attracts, along with those who are making some vaguer, narrower reference, those who want to take the country back\u00a0from, among others,\u00a0women, African Americans, Hispanics, non-Christians, and Gays, groups which have succeeded in diminishing the opportunity gap between themselves and the white, male, Christian minority that has historically maintained that gap to their own advantage and in accord with their own bigotries. And while we have progressed in diminishing the gap, the legacy of history remains with us today, and demands our forward-looking rather than backward-looking\u00a0attention.<\/p>\n<p>Those who have the courage to hope, to aspire to do better, don&#8217;t ever want their country &#8220;back.&#8221; We always want it &#8220;forward.&#8221; Our history has been the story of a people moving forward, conceived in a Declaration of Independence which\u00a0continued and contributed to\u00a0a transformation of the world already underway, accelerating our reach for future possibilities, and our removal of the shackles of past institutional deficiencies. It was a nation of Progressives, of people who knew that you don&#8217;t just accept the institutions handed down, but always seek to refine and improve them. It was\u00a0a nation that drafted a document by which to govern itself, one which proved insufficient (The Articles of Confederation, drafted and adopted in 1777, though not actually ratified until 1781), and then got its representatives together to try again, ten years later, and get it right (producing the U.S. Constitution, which was a document drafted to strengthen, not weaken, the federal government).<\/p>\n<p>The drafting and ratification of our brilliant Constitution marked a beginning, not an end, a point of departure through which to express and fully realize our collective genius, not an impediment to the use of our reason and will to address the challenges yet to come. It was drafted by people wise enough and humble enough not to imbue it with the quasi-religious hold it (or an insulting\u00a0caricature of it)\u00a0now has over some\u00a0contracted imaginations. It was meant to be a source of guidance rather than a source of idolatry. It provided the nation with a robust legal framework through which to address future challenges, some of which were\u00a0already visible\u00a0at the time, and some of which were not, but which the framers knew would\u00a0ceaselessly present themselves (and which many thought would promptly make the Constitution itself obsolete. The fact that that hasn&#8217;t come to pass is a tribute to our ability to make from the document they created in a given historical context one which adapts itself to changing historical circumstances).<\/p>\n<p>Ahead of the country remained the abolition of slavery, the protection of individual civil rights from state as well as federal power, a far-too-late end to the slaughter and displacement of the indigenous population (too late because they had already been nearly exterminated, and removed to tiny, infertile plots of land), the institution of free universal public education, the extension of suffrage to unpropertied males and women, the passage of anti-trust laws to preserve a competitive market, the establishment and necessary growth of an administrative infrastructure which immediately preceded and facilitated the most robust acceleration of economic growth in the history of the world, the desegregation of our schools, the passage of The Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the beginnings of absolutely\u00a0crucial efforts\u00a0to address the long-term detrimental health and economic consequences of environmental contamination.<\/p>\n<p>There never was a moment in the course of this story when there weren&#8217;t challenges yet to be identified and addressed, many of which could only be successfully addressed by means of government, and, often, only by means of the federal government (e.g., the abolition of slavery, which ended up requiring the federal government to prosecute a civil war; the enforcement of Civil Rights protections; and environmental protections\u00a0covering interstate pollutants). Our Founding Fathers understood that. Thomas Jefferson himself said that every generation needed to refine its institutions to adapt to changing circumstances and meet the challenges of their own day. Such people never wanted their country &#8220;back.&#8221; They always wanted it &#8220;forward.&#8221; And they dreamed of establishing a country that would renew rather than renounce that commitment with every new generation.<\/p>\n<p>Though there are many today who don&#8217;t get this, most don&#8217;t get it by means of blurry vision and historical inconsistency, rather than a retroactive commitment to what they claim currently to be an immutable truth. It is a tiny minority today, utterly detached from reality, who want to completely abolish Social Security or Medicare, though there are many who vehemently oppose health care reform and improved financial sector regulation. The difference between those past acts of our federal government that we have come to take for granted and whose value we almost universally recognize, and those present acts of our federal government that so many (so absurdly) call a &#8220;socialist&#8221; threat to our &#8220;liberty,&#8221; isn&#8217;t in the nature of the policies themselves (they are actually very similar in nature), but rather\u00a0in the difference\u00a0of perspective granted by elapsed time and an improved quality of life.<\/p>\n<p>The impassioned, angry, vehement opposition to today&#8217;s progressive reforms, almost down to the precise words and phrases (including cries of &#8220;socialism&#8221;), is virtually identical to that which confronted the passage of Social Security and Medicare in their day. It is the\u00a0perennial\u00a0resurgence\u00a0of the same faction, the same force at work today as in those previous generations: The voice of fear, the clinging to past failures and deficiencies for lack of courage, the\u00a0perception of progress as a threat rather than a promise, though those same cowering souls could hardly imagine living without the promises of progress fulfilled before their birth and in their youth. They take gladly from those progressives who came before and fought to establish the world they now take for granted, but fight passionately against those progressives of today striving to provide similar gifts of social improvement to future generations.<\/p>\n<p>In Colorado, these two sides, these two opposing forces of Hope and Fear, are embodied in our U.S. Senate and Gubernatorial races. In both races, it is the urbane, highly informed, business savvy, pragmatic Progressive pitted against the retrograde, chauvinistic, insular and regressionary Conservative. Michael Bennet, as I have\u00a0written before at some length (<a title=\"Permanent Link to Why Michael Bennet Truly Impresses Me\" rel=\"bookmark\" href=\"http:\/\/coloradoconfluence.com\/?p=732\">Why Michael Bennet Truly Impresses Me<\/a>), is a model of reason, civility, humility, and subtle systemic understanding, all focused on how to leave our children with more rather than less opportunity than we ourselves have enjoyed. Ken Buck, his opponent, is a sexist troglodyte who accused a rape victim of &#8220;buyer&#8217;s remorse&#8221;\u00a0\u00a0(though the accused\u00a0rapist admitted in a taped phone call from the police station that he had in fact raped her!),\u00a0a\u00a0candidate who opposes access to abortions even by victims of rape and incest (condemning some pre-teen girls to a premature motherhood that will, in some cases,\u00a0utterly destroy them). With the same indifference to reality, Buck\u00a0is committed to the pseudo-economic certainties of his ideological camp, certainties which defy the lessons of history and the\u00a0prevailing economic models\u00a0of those who actually study the subject.<\/p>\n<p>In our gubernatorial race, we have a very similar match-up, with Democratic candidate John Hickenlooper (currently the very popular mayor of Denver) as a model of the rational, urbane entrepreneur (who, after being laid off as a geologist in his youth, opened a very successful brewpub in\u00a0a downtown Denver area\u00a0&#8211;LoDo&#8211; which,\u00a0through his\u00a0enterprise and hard work, he helped to turn into a very robust restaurant and bar district), opposed by Tom Tancredo, the U.S. Congressman (from my district, CD 6) who became nationally and internationally infamous for his outspoken xenophobia and belligerent anti-immigrant demagoguery. Again, it is a race of hope\u00a0against fear, a repeat of similar struggles we have seen around the world throughout human history, with prosperity and human welfare flourishing where hope has prevailed, and a contraction of wealth and opportunity taking hold where fear prevails\u00a0(sometimes accompanied by nightmares of violence directed against the scapegoats who have been identified\u00a0as personified targets of that\u00a0fear).<\/p>\n<p>Economically,\u00a0 Hope counsels that we employ the best economic models to forge the best fiscal and economic policies possible to ensure the robustness, sustainability, and equity of our economic system, while Fear counsels that we base our economic policies on information-stripped platitudes, contracting rather than expanding, insulating rather than competing, cowering rather than aspiring. A hopeful people invests in its future; a fearful people stuffs its\u00a0money in a mattress. A hopeful people works to create a higher quality of life, while a fearful people works toward enshrining past achievements and, by doing so, obstructing future ones. A hopeful people seeks to expand opportunity; a fearful people seeks to protect what&#8217;s theirs from incursions by others. A hopeful people reaches out, looks past the horizon, and works toward positive goals. A fearful people builds walls, huddles together, and obstructs the dreams and aspirations of others.<\/p>\n<p>But this year, in this election, it is not just any other incarnation of the struggle between Hope and Fear. It is the most dangerous form of that struggle, the form it takes when we are on the brink of inflicting on ourselves enormous suffering. Because the struggle this year is characterized by a terrifying discrepancy in passion: The angry, fearful mob is ascendant, while cooler heads are<strong><em> too<\/em><\/strong> cool, too uninspired, to face that mob down and disperse it.<\/p>\n<p>It is under just such circumstances\u00a0when, historically,\u00a0Fear prevails over Hope. It is under these circumstances, circumstances that the hopeful among us are <em>allowing<\/em> to\u00a0take hold,\u00a0when countries get sucked into the nightmare that fear produces. This is what responsible, reasonable people of goodwill cannot, <em><strong>must not<\/strong><\/em>, allow to happen.<\/p>\n<p>Vote. Make sure everyone you know votes. Confront the angry, frightened and frightening mob and insist that we are better than that. Don&#8217;t let them put this state, this country, and this world back into Reverse again, as it was from 2001-2009, when America became a nation defined by fear,\u00a0with a\u00a0government defined by the belligerent ignorance which is Fear&#8217;s most loyal servant. Let&#8217;s keep this nation in Drive, and move hopefully into the future. In 2008, many of us were excited by that prospect, and in 2010, we should\u00a0remain\u00a0warriors of reason and goodwill\u00a0in the face of the\u00a0Grendel of small-mindendness\u00a0awoken by\u00a0the small, fledgling steps forward we have taken as a people. We\u00a0need to defend, preserve, and advance\u00a0what we accomplished in 2008. We need to move forward, not backward.<\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t sit this one out. Don&#8217;t let the brutal tyranny of Fear and Ignorance rule us.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/A-Conspiracy-of-Wizards-ebook\/dp\/B00F07YZOK\/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&#038;qid=1378468154&#038;sr=8-2&#038;keywords=a+conspiracy+of+wizards\"><strong>Buy my e-book <em>A Conspiracy of Wizards<\/em><\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Buy my e-book A Conspiracy of Wizards The title quote, uttered by President Obama to describe the choice we have in\u00a0the 2010 elections, captures the essence of\u00a0the on-going struggle between humanity&#8217;s inner-angels and\u00a0inner-demons, a struggle which produces the realization of both our dreams and our nightmares, depending on which prevails in any given moment of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[4],"tags":[225,523,656,661,657,658,527,425,525,299,606,660,659],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/coloradoconfluence.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/892"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/coloradoconfluence.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/coloradoconfluence.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coloradoconfluence.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coloradoconfluence.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=892"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/coloradoconfluence.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/892\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":894,"href":"https:\/\/coloradoconfluence.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/892\/revisions\/894"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/coloradoconfluence.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coloradoconfluence.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coloradoconfluence.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}